He had stayed at the house for dinner and had enjoyed the repast. but he had followed her place and insisted they talk ( Welty. because she had non wanted to talk with him. they talked about how William and Hazel had met which indicated that the communicating had non been perfect between them in the beginning. As the two were walking to happen a net and to enroll other people to assist in the hunt. His character is reasonably well-developed in the narrative as he is portrayed as the loyal best-friend who will stand by his friend and aid with whatever undertaking is required of him including dragging the river.
He foremost found his friend Virgil who had spent the dark out with him.
Alternatively he ran out of the house to garner people to drag the river for her organic structure. 188 ) and would hold questioned whether she had followed through with the menace. If he had read the whole note he perchance would hold noticed that the note was non finished ( Welty. It states he was afraid to read the whole note. The text foremost introduces the communicating jobs at the beginning of the narrative by depicting how Hazel would non speak to William and so makes the point stronger when William finds the note. Throughout the narrative there is indicant that the narrative has a deeper subject or subtext that is centered around the thought that it truly talks about communicating or the deficiency of it. Without vacillation or a idea that she may hold gone someplace else he rushes out to acquire aid dragging the river to happen her organic structure. He enters the house to happen his married woman gone and merely a note left to state him of her purposes. It begins when William Wallace returns place from a dark out with his friends. On the surface the narrative appears to be about a man’s frenetic hunt for his married woman who has claimed to hold gone to the river to submerge herself.
0 kommentar(er)
